Nov 9, 2017 Posted by AGA Editor

Anyone who claims Bitcoin is better than gold or silver are incredibly deluded

First, let me start by saying I love bitcoin. We’ll the idea of it anyway. Bitcoin screams that we all want a more honest money system. Any anytime we can get our hard earned money out of the system (banks and Government), it’s a good thing. But, replacing a make up fiat currency system with a made up digital currency system is madness. Bitcoin a virtual currency, backed by absolutely nothing except the fierce belief in the integrity of a complex mathematical formula which few of its proponents even understand, and is proving to be little more trustworthy than the U.S. dollar, after hackers tested and defeated controls put in place to manage it, and then fail at the first hurdle. Yeah, that sounds about right. And the market value of one Bitcoin has gone from about $.02 to over $7,500. Seriously? “Virtual currency like Bitcoins are innovations that deserves great caution, given the lack of any guarantees and responsible parties to back them in the longer term or evidence that this isn’t just another Ponzi scheme.” In reality, Bitcoin creators are faceless and anonymous and you have no idea if they are cyber-criminals or well intentioned people who are looking out for you. As far as I am concerned, Bitcoin is just another tool, another penny stock, another empty shell company, and another way for you to make or lose money. In the fall of 2011, bitcoin was at $2. By November 2017 it had risen to more than $7,500! If that’s a currency, those bitcoinians must be some productive citizens. So why is gold and silver  better than bitcoin? Despite the fact that gold and silver is a fundamental element of the cosmos and can’t be destroyed with a software error, there are really people running around the internet claiming Bitcoin is “better than gold and silver.” They point to the fact that Bitcoin is incredibly portable (which is true) and easy to transfer to other parties without lugging around physical coins (also true when there’s a functioning power grid and internet infrastructure), yet nearly same advantages can be attributed to a checking account. I don’t hear anyone arguing that a checking account is “better than gold and silver.” Another myth about Bitcoin is that all transactions are anonymous. This is absurd and stupid, given that the entire history of every Bitcoin transaction is replicated in the public blockchain, meaning that every Bitcoin transaction is easily tracked. (If you want real... read more

Nov 5, 2017 Posted by AGA Editor

Quote

“Liberty solves our problems, government does not.” Dr. Ron Paul – Mises Conference 2017 read more

Nov 4, 2017 Posted by AGA Editor

Do you know the law and is there evidence that the laws apply to you?

Legal is NOT whatever the government says it is. LAWFUL has evolved over centuries based on common sense and case law. To break a law is to commit a crime, which requires an injured party of some description. A breach of policy, statute or act is NOT a crime. In fact, I challenge you to find evidence that the states codes, statues or the Constitution applies to you or anyone else. In almost all non-injured party cases (traffic tickets, drug possession, etc.) the the prosecution lacks evidence to support their claims of jurisdiction and a valid cause of action. When you are STOPPED and DETAINED by an officer for a civil infraction the legal facts are that the officer has perpetrated an illegal and unlawful seizure and false arrest/imprisonment the moment he perpetrated the stop. He both COULD have known and SHOULD have known that his actions violated your rights and the law. Therefore, EVERYTHING he did or discovered during that detainment/seizure of your person and property was ILLEGAL and should be challenged and declared as inadmissible facts, testimony, and evidence under the fruit of the poison tree doctrine. You will need to file a motion to dismiss for lack of evidence and jurisdiction as they CANNOT obtain evidence OR jurisdiction using ILLEGAL means can they? Here are 7 question you can ask in your motion to dismiss. I a lot of cases we never get past question 3 before the plaintiff is asking to dismiss the case. 1) “Is the allegation being made considered to be a CIVIL INFRACTION under [Your State] law?” 2) “Can a warrantless arrest or detention be lawfully perpetrated in relation to a CIVIL matter under [Your State] law?” 3) “May a warrant of arrest be obtained WITHOUT a valid statement of probable cause under [Your State] law?” 4) “Under [Your State] law, is a statement of probable cause sufficient to obtain a warrant of arrest if it does NOT allege that an actual crime was perpetrated by the person named or described therein to be arrested?” 5) “Under [Your State] law, did Officer Shitforbrains witness ANY actual CRIME that would have provided him/her with the required reasonable suspicion or articulable probable cause authorizing a warrantless detention or arrest of an individual?” 6) “Under [Your State] law, did Officer Shitforbrains witness ANY actual CRIME that would have provided him/her with the required probable cause necessary to state sufficient grounds of criminal activity in order... read more

Oct 20, 2017 Posted by AGA Editor

The American justice system is not about truth or justice

The American justice system is not about truth or justice, it is about control through manipulation of procedural due process. A judge usurps a forbidden power when s/he rules to alter the content or meaning of what a law encompasses. By ruling that the law encompasses that which is not addressed or acts to obfuscate or diminish that which is clearly and specifically addressed, he/she does so in order to alter that laws intended logical application, thereby manipulating procedural due process. The power to rewrite the meaning of any law is not one delegated to the courts. The limit of the courts is and shall always be, first to rule that the law does not violate any provision(s) of the state constitution or any right of the individual as protected thereunder, or second, to rule that the law does violate some provision or right and declare it unconstitutional and void. There simply is no delegated authority for the court to “rewrite” the law to make it conform and be acceptable. Either a law is or it is not constitutional based solely on its language and content. The determination should always be that if a common man of average intelligence, having read the law, understands its language to permit acts that violate the state constitution or the individual rights of the people, then, the only thing the court is empowered to do is to declare it unconstitutional on its face. This is the power of a fully informed jury, and precisely why American court judges have suppressed and denied that right to juries for decades, because it takes the control away from the judges. Take back our courts; take back our right to proper and competent due process; demand that our juries right to determine both the facts and the proper meaning and application of the law be enforced and recognized by the courts. Demand a fully informed jury! Are you awake... read more

Sep 23, 2017 Posted by AGA Editor

The Tiny Dot – Do 350,000,000 dots have to listen to a few hundred dots?

Most of you large dots spend year after year begging for lower taxes because you are too lazy to get together as a group and control the tiny dot the way it was designed to operate. The tiny dot was designed to be a small organizational body for the protection of the large dots rights. But the large dots would rather play video games, watch movies, get drunk, watch sports, etc etc etc than participate in the control of the small dot. Are you awake... read more