Yes, A Judge DID Call For The FBI and US Marshals To Arrest Congress And The President

I know you have seen it… an article went completely viral titled, “Judge Calls For FBI and US Marshals To Arrest Congress And The President.” Shortly after it was published, a few websites came out and said that a real judge really didn’t say those things. Interestingly though, the original link and pdf to the statement was in the article itself. Then on December 18th, 2015, Judge Anna von Reitz issued this statement, confirming that she did indeed call for the FBI and US Marshals to arrest congress and the president: A Reply to “Snopes” and All Others: Yes, an Alaskan state judge HAS called upon the US Marshals and the rest of the “law enforcement agencies” to do their real job. There are two systems of law in this country, and it is long past time for you all to learn the facts. When The Constitution was adopted there was already a Common Law Court System in this country that had been established for over 200 years. The Constitution created an additional “federal” court system for the needs of the “federal government”—- that court system is obligated to function in two venues only: administrative (Article I) and maritime/admiralty (Article III). As you can see for yourself if you ever wake up and bother to look, the Seventh Amendment very clearly stipulates that ALL matters involving living people and their property assets in excess of $20 are to be decided under Common Law and as you can also readily find out Erie Railroad v. Thompkins (1938) there is no such thing as Federal Common Law. Since all the “States of States” incorporated and adopted the Uniform Commercial Code circa 1965, they have operated as “federal States of States” as defined in the UCC Definitions Section. All these things calling themselves “States” — except for one—are actually corporate franchises of the parent corporations located in Delaware or Washington, DC, respectively, and are private, for-profit organizations no different from General Electric or Macy’s and having NO public office, authority, oath, or bond at all. They are merely “governmental services corporations” in the business of doing what? Providing governmental services to you as a consumer. All these “courts” you see calling themselves various fictitious names like the “SUPREME COURT FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA” are operated by members of the American Bar Association— all declared to be foreign agents of the British Crown employed as bill collectors. They are all corporations imposing... read more

The Government does NOT have the authority to “Grant Rights”.

Let’s get some things straight…. – The government does not grant rights. – The government has no RIGHT to grant ANYTHING. – In a government of the people, by the people, and for the people – the government has PRIVILEGES granted to it by the people. – The Constitution was written to PROTECT the People’s Rights from the government, and to tell the government what privileges is was granted by the people. The Government does NOT have the authority to “Grant Rights”. The United States is a Constitutional Republic, which means that it derives any and all of its power from a document written by the people. In other words – we live in a country that is ruled of the people, by the people and for the people… not of the government, by the government, and for the government. What that means is, that any authority granted to the Government is at best – a privilege, not a right! It is governing authority that is granted to them, and as such can also be taken away from them! The government doesn’t grant rights. Your rights are inherent – natural, and inalienable rights – which are yours by virtue of your very existence. For instance – your right to life – was not granted to you by the government. The government had no say in whether you should be allowed to do or not, and constitutionally – they never should! The constitution wasn’t written to GRANT rights…. but to preserve them. If you take the time to read it, you’ll find that it is worded in such a way as to PREVENT the government from TAKING away those rights. Not to establish them, but to protect the rights that you already have. Any questions? You have been awakened. As a reader you deserve to know the truth behind the disasters America and the rest of the world faces. If you want to learn more about what is going on in America then consider joining America’s Great Awakening Newsletter. These newsletters are free for a limited time.JOIN US TODAY If you are already a member you can, sign in... read more

Reality Check: The Middle East was better off with Saddam Hussein and Muammar Gaddafi in power.

Was the Middle East better off with Saddam Hussein and Muammar Gaddafi in power? This is a Reality Check you won’t see anywhere else. We wonder why? We’ve seen a consistent mistake in foreign policy, we’ve seen Democrats and a lot of establishment Republicans in Washington get involved in toppling Middle Eastern governments, and it ends up benefiting no one. Except for radical Islamic terrorists. American intervention since the start of the Iraq war has led from one disaster to another. Was the world in fact a better place the middle east a better place when Muammar Gaddafi and Saddam Hussein was in power and when Assad wasn’t fighting for his life in Syria? The Middle East was without question a safer and more secure place under Gaddafi, Hussein and when Assad wasn’t fighting for his life. But to really get that point, here are some things to consider. In reports from our own U.S. government, reports of deaths from terrorism in the Middle East between 2002 and 2014 have increased 4,500 percent. But lets go a little deeper. Take for instance just the country of Iraq. Before the 2003 U.S. invasion, do you know how many suicide attacks there were in Iraq? None. In the country’s history there had never been one. But since the 2003 invasion, there have been 1,892. In Iraq, prior to the start of the Iraq war, there were reportedly just over 1.5 million Christians living in that country. And yet shortly after the war started, more than one million of them fled to Syria. That didn’t work out well. Today fewer than a quarter million Christians remain and yet are being exterminated by groups like ISIS. And what about Afghanistan? Just last year alone, insurgents killed 2,643 civilians last year—the highest number since U.N. records began. How about Pakistan? In the 14 years prior to 9/11 there was one suicide attack on Pakistani soil. In the 14 years since, there have been 486 suicide attacks. The same is true in the past 14 years in Somalia (88), Yemen (85), Libya (29), Nigeria (91), and Syria (165). So what you need to know is that 14 years after this so-called war on terror began, the United States is on track to have spent $13 trillion on just the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. To put that into perspective, that means we have spent $145,000 per American household. And most of it was borrowed money... read more

The Truth About 9/11 Just Won’t Die

The conspiracy theories started flying just days after the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks on New York and Washington, DC. Over the decade since, several claims have been refined by the “9/11 Truth” movement. Perhaps the most bizarre aspect of September 11 was the rapid destruction of both 110-story Twin Towers: after the collapses began due to cascading structural failures at the airplane impact locations, each tower fell completely in just fifteen to twenty seconds. Now there is a video (see below) of some guy trying to disprove the conspiracy of 9/11 and in my opinion ends up being the biggest moron on the Internet. This guy has conducted a highly scientific experiment, that, in his mind, clearly shows how jet fuel can bend steel and therefore this debunks the conspiracy theories that suggest jet fuel alone could not have possible brought down the Twin Towers on 9/11. I have many problems with this video, not least because it literally proves nothing, is a complete waste of his time and everyone else’s, and has succeeded only in melting the last few remaining brain cells left in his empty skull coming up with this ridiculous “de-bunking”. Firstly, comparing 1/2 inch steel bars with the 87 feet by 133 feet steel core structures, as big as buses, that were covered in tonnes of concrete and fireproofed, is so ludicrous and un-scientific that he immediately lost my respect in his argument. I stuck with him though for the purposes of this blog, where he then continues to lambast everyone by calling them an “idiot” for even daring to suggest that jet fuel did not cause the WTC to fall that day. Ouch.. He conveniently seems to have forgotten that the WTC’s fell at free fall speed, so even if we were to take him and his silly outfit seriously and indeed jet fuel did weaken the steel, the building would have tilted and bent as he suggests in the video. Not fall straight down at the same speed it would take to drop a penny off the roof of the building. Then we come to the greatest fail, when he goes over to a roaring furnace, not an actual replication of a jet fuel fire obviously, that would be too scientific. The camera cuts over to the furnace where we conveniently don’t get to see how long the steel bar has been in the furnace being subject to constant direct heat, and... read more

America’s Conundrum

The definition of the word Conundrum is: something that is puzzling or confusing. Here are six Conundrums of socialism in the United States of America today 1. America is capitalist and greedy – yet half of the population (49%) is subsidized. 2. Half of the population is subsidized – yet they think they are victims. 3. They think they are victims – yet their representatives, for whom they vote, run the government. 4. Their representatives run the government – yet the poor keep getting poorer. 5. The poor keep getting poorer – yet they have things for which people in other countries can only dream of possessing. 6. They have things that people in other countries only dream about – yet they want America to be more like those other countries and to use them as a model. Think about it! And that, my friends, pretty much sums up the USA in the 21st Century. Makes you wonder who is doing the math. These three, short sentences tell you a lot about the direction of our current government and cultural environment. 1. We are advised to NOT judge ALL Muslims by the actions of a few lunatics, but we are encouraged to judge ALL gun owners by the actions of a few lunatics. Funny how that works. And here’s another one worth considering… 2. Seems we constantly hear about how Social Security is going to run out of money. But we never hear about welfare or food stamps running out of money? What’s interesting is the first group “worked for” their money, but the second didn’t. Think about it….. and Last but not least… 3. Why are we cutting benefits for our veterans, no pay raises for our military and reducing the size of our army (too expensive to maintain), but we are not stopping the payments or benefits to illegal aliens, or cutting federal aid to foreign countries. Am I the only one missing... read more